Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | My Orble | Login

Tennis - July 2009

This is the second edition of my guide to tennis. This is made for the non fan, and has a very simplified explanation of all things tennis.

Court Surfaces

Battle of the Surfaces
Nadal vs. Federer on Grass-Clay Court


There are three basic courts:

Clay
Hard
Grass

As you can tell by my wonderful use of primary (and secondary) colors, clay is usually red, grass is usually green, and hard courts are usually blue. This said, green clay, blue clay, and green hard courts are also very common. I've also heard of Black clay, and hard courts that come in every color (orange, bright green, red, and even three different colors for World Team Tennis). The best way to tell is it get down on your knees and lick the court (j/k).

Ok, that would actually work out really well, but for reasons that don't need to be said, it's better to just touch them. Hard Courts will usually be asphalt or some sort of plastic that is (surprise!) hard to the touch. Grass will feel like dirt, and Clay has a little layer of dust on the top.

Seriously, it's not hard at all to distinguish them.

Click on this if you like reading Wiki pages more than me. (It'll have more detail, references, and no fun.)

----------------------------- -----------------------------
Clay Courts
(click on the title!)

Clay Courts of Roland Garros
Guillermo Coria and Carlos Moya on the signature red Clay Courts of the French Open


These courts are the classically colored "red" courts. The French Open (Roland Garros) is traditionally associated with this. Other famous tournaments on Clay include Barcelona, Madrid, Rome, and a number of South American Tournaments like Vina Del Mar. *You'll find that since Tournaments are always switching sponsorship, it's easier to refer to them by location.*

Most courts are made from brick because literal clay courts, like those of the olden days take too long to dry out. You'll find these are usually red. The "American" clay courts are green in color.

Clay courts are defined as "Slow courts". This is because the ball bounces higher, and bounces slower than it would on a hard court. Because of this high bounce, players that use a LOT of topspin, like Nadal and Federer are at an advantage, since they force players to constantly hit tiring shoulder-level shots.

Clay is unique because of the movement. It is actually (all too) possible, and necessary to slide on clay. This sliding comes naturally to players that have played on clay from a young age. Because of this, these players are at a natural advantage on clay. I would tell you what a "clay court specialist" is like Wikipedia, but unlike Wiki, I believe in the intelligence of the people that read this.

Another unique thing about the clay is that the ball leaves a mark on the ground, making the use of shot tracking devices...well...useless. That means that this'll never happen or matter on clay.

The best Clay Court specialists of all time include the recently retired Gustavo Kuerten, legend Bjorn Borg, classic Rene Lacoste, and current Clay Champion Rafael Nadal (he still has more than Federer).

----------------------------- -----------------------------

Hard Courts
(OMG Click on that too!)

US Open Hard Court
Andre Agassi serving to Pete Sampras at the Australian Open


Now, here is where you can see the difference between me and the Wiki monstah (I'm from Boston, that's how we say it).

Basically, there are two types of hard courts, asphalt, and acrylic hybrid courts of all types. The Australian Open and the US Open play on Hard Courts.

The most common hard court you'll see is just plain asphalt. This is the variety, indoor and outdoor that I was raised on, and it's where I am comfortable, like many, many tennis players around the US. Neither the US Open, nor the Australian Open use this.

The US Open uses this.

Until recently, the Australian Open used this, but then they switched to this.

To be honest, pretty much only the pros would notice, or care so much about these changes, since tennis is such a precise sport (less precise than Billiards/Pool or golf, but more than, say, Hockey or Basketball).

The most interesting thing for me about hard courts is that many players still manage to slide on it, since they are so athletic, and move so quickly.

The best hard courters of all time are much harder to define, since almost all the greats were good on it. Roger Federer, Pete Sampras, and Andre Agassi are three recent greats.

----------------------------- -----------------------------

Grass

(you should know by now...)

Wimbledon
Federer getting ready to serve at Wimbledon.


The oldest and most traditional of the tennis surfaces. Once upon a time, 3 of the opens were held on this surface, then two of them upgraded to most consistent ones. For a long time, grass courts played quickly but they are known as "Slow courts". The grass at Wimbledon is actually getting slower every year. The courts used to give the advantage to serve and volley-ers who would come in on every single point. This has recently given way to baseline grass court play, which makes for a more well rounded and interesting match.

One problem with grass is that sometimes it's slippery. If you want a great example of a professional demonstrating how slippery these courts are, just watch Djokovic's first match of the Wimbledon this year. The year before, he complained about his shoes being too slippery, and it seemed like the problem persisted. Obviously, this affects other players, but Djokovic is a very good digger and almost never loses his balance on any surface. His slipping at this year's Wimbledon opening round surprised me, but after that dreadful first round, his foot work looked (as they say in England) dapper.

Currently, Wimbledon is one of the only tournaments played on grass, and certainly is the most important. Federer, Borg, Sampras, Agassi, McEnroe and Connors all found Wimbledon to be one of their best stages.

If you want to read more about the more obscure surfaces like carpet, go somewhere else. Honestly, I'm not even willing to give it time of day. (take that carpet fans!)
29
Vote
   


Hi everybody,

I want this site to be for more than just the hard-core tennis fan. I also want this to be for the average person, who is slightly interested in tennis and doesn't know much about the sport. I know that when I was first learning about tennis, I learned one thing in lessons, and quite another by watching tennis. There was so much more to the game than I thought there was and this is going to be the first of many posts where I talk about tennis in general, or tennis history.

This post will be about the court, and each post will have a similar theme about the game (i.e. The Swing, Footwork, Psychology, The Serve).

Hall of Fame Tennis Court and Fred Perry Statue
Hall of Fame Tennis Court and Fred Perry Statue


The Court

Tennis Court
A Fully Labeled Tennis Court


Sorry for the blurriness, I've been having trouble with this on Orble in other posts too. The best thing would be to click on that and just keep it open while I explain what each term means.

From the top:

Baseline - This is the line that defines the length of the court. You cannot touch this with your feet during your serve, and if the ball bounces past it, then it is deemed out. It is recommended to stay around the baseline during points as an optimal area to cover the court.

Center Mark - This does almost nothing. Just stay on the right side of it when serving on even points (i.e. to start a game, at duece, 30-love, 15-all, etc.), and the left on odd points.

Doubles Alleys - These widen the points for doubles play. In doubles, the serve can also be behind these areas (as opposed to only behind the single's court). The serve must still go in the service box, but any balls after the serve can go anywhere on the court, including the double's alleys.

Service Line - The ball must bounce on this line or before it (towards the net) to be deemed in. If it goes past, then it is out.

Service Box - Served balls must bounce in this box.

Net (not shown) - This is the dark line that splits the court in half in the picture. It is pretty much self explanatory. The top part is called the "tape" or "cord".

Center Line - Serves can bounce on this line and be called in from either side.

No Man's Land - This is generally a bad place to stand. You either want to be at the baseline, hitting rallies, or up at the net playing volleys. Obviously, as you get more into the game, you'll see that this is overgeneralized, but it's a great starting point for strategy.

Ad Court - This side of the court is called "Ad Court" because you play only on that side during Advantage points.

Deuce Court
- This is misspelled on the picture, the spelling here is correct. It's the exact opposite as the Ad Court.

I hope this was helpful. In my next posts, I think I'll describe more about the history of courts and the surfaces.

32
Vote
   


Second Winds

July 28th 2009 02:49
First off, let me just explain that I've changed the Theme from Wimbledon Greens to US Open Blue.

I've also added a banner to reflect those changes. Onto the real post:
----------------------------- ----------------------------- ---------------------------

The theme of this post will be players that are having Second Winds in their careers. My definition of this is that the person must be:

--Older than Roger Federer
--In the Top 30, OR has had a Quarterfinal or higher appearance in a Slam in 2008 or 2009
--Moved up considerably in the rankings
--Seems to have gotten better skill-wise with age

----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------

#1 is the person that I'm most interested in right now as a player:

IVO KARLOVIC

Ivo Karlovic
Karlovic serving in WImbledon Against Verdasco


Ivo Karlovic is a Croatian tennis player, commonly known as the Tallest Person to every be on the ATP World Tour, towering his opponents at an impressive 6' 10''. Obviously, this gives him a great serve and volley, even in today's fast paced, all court game. Recently, in the 2009 Wimbledon, where he went to the Quarterfinals is his best result.

The reason I like this guy is because he used to be all serve, but something happened this year, and suddenly, he can hit too. This said, his serving is still the first on the tour, and he doesn't even play as many matches as most other players (since he usually doesn't go as far into the draw as other good servers like Roddick and Federer usually do). Out of the top 10 Ace hitters in the league, he's tied for first in the least amount of matches played.

Per match, he's out-acing Roddick, who is in the number two position in the ATP for aces, by A LOT. Here are their stats (it goes Aces, Matches Played, and then Aces per match). :

Karlovic: [643] [31] [20.75]
Roddick: [614] [46] [13.35]

To put this in perspective, Roddick has the third best Aces per Match statistic out of the top 50 Ace leaders in the ATP. You have to go down to the fourteenth spot to find someone who can actually beat Roddick's Ace per Match stat. That would be John Isner, another huge serving, young American. His Aces per Match are 15.26, which is still blown away by Karlovic's 20.75.

Karlovic also leads the ATP in his 1st Serve points won, Service games won, and Break points saved statistics. Yeah...he wins more service games than Andy Roddick. Hard to believe until you see his serve. On average, he hits faster serves than anyone on the circuit.

He also has the most aces in a match (all time) and the second most service aces in a season (all time). Out of the top 11 most aces in a match, Karlovic holds four spots, which is the most on the list.

You can expect to see him climb the rankings from his current #25 in the near future.

----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------

Nikolay Davydenko

Nikolay Davydenko
Davydenko in 2009 WImbledon


Davydenko has been in the top 10 for a while, so I'm not sure how to classify this guy. He first broke into the top ten in the week of June 6th, 2006. Five months later, in November of 2006, he broke into the top 5, where he stayed (mostly) until June of this year.

Before 2007 he was known mostly for being a very hard worker and an all around good player. Since then, his career was surrounded in controversy. I don't want to get into all the juicy details of this old piece of gossip, so you can click on THIS to read about it yourself.

The reason I'm including him into this list is because I think he can climb up to his old ranking. I think he can overcome Del Potro and reclaim his #5 spot. To put it quite honestly, Federer, Nadal, Murray, and Djokovic have too much game for him, but still, look for Davydenko to shake things up in the next couple of Opens and Masters.

----------------------------- ----------------------------- -----------------------------

Fernando Gonzalez

Fernando Gonzalez
Gonzo hitting his signature forehand


It's hard to tell with Gonzo. I'm again (like with Davydenko) not sure if he's having a second wind, or if he actually hit his peak and that he's only going down from here. He's beaten pretty much every notable player of the last 15 years, including many legends like Federer, Agassi, Sampras, and many others.

The reason I included him on this list is twofold. One is that earlier this year, at Rome, I watched his match against Juan Monaco from 2AM to 4AM. It just captivated me. I was fatigued and nodding off when I flipped to this match. I started watching and I was hooked. At this moment, I realized that I loved watching power tennis. I still remember at around, 3AM, during the second set, it was tied at 3-3 and one line judge made a horrible call against Gonzo. Next thing I know, he exploded, and then went back to his return position. Juan Monaco launched this serve right at Gonzo's forehand, and he literally ripped it. It was a 100 mph service return that threw the match's momentum in Gonzo's favor. After that point, both players were slugging. They were trying as hard as Roddick and Federer were in the Wimbledon Final. It was that insane.

The second reason he is on this list is because two months ago (roughly), he made it to the Semifinals in the French Open, indicating that he's still got the mojo. I think he wants to win a Slam badly, and he might be able to pull it off (with the right circumstances) if he's lucky.

----------------------------- ----------------------------- ---------------------------

Tommy Haas

Tommy Haas
Haas hitting a backhand


What Second Wind list would be complete without Tommy Haas? He practically defines the word. His career has been a roller coaster. He was always a very good player, but had a lot of injury related problems and things like that holding back his career. At this year's Wimbledon, he made it to the Semifinals, tying his best singles Slam performances (three AO Semi appearances). I think that now, without injuries, he will play very well within the next two years and surprise a lot of people.

From a young age, he was hailed as a tennis star, and finally, everyone thinks it's his time to shine like he was meant to. His career is one of the more interesting ones among the players still around. He hit the number 2 spot a couple of years back, and since then he's been as low as 1,000.

You can definitely look for him in the US Open and the next Australian.

----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------

Now, there were a lot of players I could've, but didn't put on here. Ones that I wanted to add were Mardy Fish, Andy Roddick, and Tommy Robredo, but I ended up not doing those for various reasons. Hope you enjoyed this article about a couple of less talked about Tennis Players.
46
Vote
   


Davis Cup Letdown...

July 14th 2009 03:20
Well, we lost. Officially. This is what happens when Roddick gets injured. Goddamned Roddick. And his Hip. I hate Roddick's hip...

No really though, in all seriousness (I don't actually hate Roddick, injuries happen...), I'm sad that the US lost. It was such a close match. I mean, TWO five setters in one day? The chances of that are just so low


[ Click here to read more ]
35
Vote
   


Wimbledon Final (Finally)

July 11th 2009 08:28
Sorry guys, I'm unbelievably lazy and susceptible to addiction (blame the makers of Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic, not me).

Here are some things about Wimbledon that I want to say, and some things that I think are relevant to it


[ Click here to read more ]
32
Vote
   


More Posts
6 Posts
4 Posts
5 Posts
83 Posts dating from May 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Fremen's Blogs

836 Vote(s)
3 Comment(s)
21 Post(s)
2884 Vote(s)
29 Comment(s)
40 Post(s)
Moderated by Fremen
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]